Un fantôme?

@Observing: Great! We need to have a metaphysical discussion about spirits of ghosts! That'll be fun. Thanks for your comment!

@Jean-Benoît Maréchal: Pas pour le photographe (aventurier par définition!). J'essaie d'entrer, souvent en vain, dans plein d'usines désaffectés, mais elles sont souvent solidement fermées. Ici, c'était un jeu d'enfant.

@grouser: Hello. I see what you mean, but I find that when you look at the ghost, that post tends to balance the frame. But you're right, if you then look at the post, it is a bit disorienting. Thanks for your comment.

@Jonathan Alan Photography: I have to say, very interesting place to be! Thanks for stopping by my blog. Cheers, Jonathan.

@Ken McCoy: Hello Ken. That's also how I see it, that post frames the ghost. How have you guessed she was a girl? Well, you're right, that spectre is a fellow female photographer.

@Will Wood: Thank you Will. I think you're right, that ghostly figure gives a sense of reality to the shot, a point of interest. I personnally find that interesting to have a ghost in this kind of place.

@zOOm: Merci Florence!

@Martine Lapointe: Merci, mais je ne suis pas le fantôme! C'est une amie photographe.

@Marion: Hello Marion. That co-worker of yours happens to be wrong. That ghost is indeed a girl. There where a few pigeons present throughout the building, but I do no think any birds show in this particular shot. Thanks for stopping by!

@amy: Thanks, Amy!

@Vink: Et très stimulant à visiter. Merci du commentaire.

@bluechameleon: Come back wednesday for another stunning fisheye shot (eventhough it's me saying it).
This one is also a fisheye taken picture.
It's a fun lens to use, but you have to rethink how you frame. Sometimes, you need to point up and turn on yourself to achieve a nice framing. Thanks for you kind words.

@Julie: Comme tu peux le voir, je suis opportuniste! Sans toi, cette photo n'aurait pas été la même.